Former President Donald Trump is reportedly preparing to take control of the United States Postal Service (USPS) by firing the postal board of governors, according to sources familiar with the matter. This move, should it materialize, would mark a significant shift in the leadership and operations of the USPS, which has been at the center of political controversies in recent years. Trump’s intentions to reshape the postal service align with his long-standing grievances over mail-in voting and his broader efforts to consolidate influence within federal agencies.
Background on USPS Controversies
The USPS has been a focal point of political debate, particularly during the 2020 presidential election when mail-in voting surged due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Trump frequently criticized the postal service, claiming—without substantial evidence—that mail-in ballots contributed to widespread voter fraud. The postal service, under Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, implemented a series of operational changes that led to delays in mail delivery, sparking concerns about election interference.
Despite legal challenges and congressional scrutiny, DeJoy remained in his position, largely due to the support of the postal board of governors, who are responsible for hiring and firing the postmaster general. Trump’s reported plan to remove and replace the board would give him direct influence over the agency’s leadership and operations.
The Legal and Political Implications of Firing the Postal Board
The United States Postal Service operates independently of the executive branch, but the President has the authority to appoint members to the postal board of governors, subject to Senate confirmation. Once in control of the board, a president can influence the hiring and firing of the postmaster general, making the USPS susceptible to political maneuvering.
Trump’s expected move to remove the board members would likely face legal and political resistance. While federal law allows the President to remove board members “for cause,” critics argue that firing them for political reasons could face legal challenges. Additionally, any effort to remove DeJoy—who has been controversial yet steadfast in his position—could take months and require a newly appointed board’s cooperation.
Potential Changes Under a Trump-Controlled USPS
If Trump successfully overhauls the USPS leadership, several policy changes could follow. Some potential areas of impact include:
- Election Procedures and Mail-In Voting: Given Trump’s past criticisms of mail-in voting, a USPS under his control could implement policies that make voting by mail more restrictive. This could include reducing postal resources dedicated to election mail, implementing stricter ballot delivery deadlines, or increasing scrutiny of mail-in ballots.
- Operational Changes and Privatization: Trump has expressed interest in privatizing aspects of the USPS, arguing that the agency operates inefficiently. A newly appointed board could push for increased privatization, cost-cutting measures, and potential service reductions that could disproportionately affect rural communities.
- Leadership Shakeups: With a new board in place, Trump could attempt to install a new postmaster general who aligns more closely with his policies and vision for the postal service. This could mean a departure from DeJoy’s tenure or a continuation with an adjusted strategy.
- Financial Restructuring: The USPS has long struggled with financial sustainability, partly due to a 2006 congressional mandate requiring it to pre-fund retiree health benefits. A Trump-aligned board might seek changes in the agency’s financial model, potentially revisiting past Republican proposals to alter its funding mechanisms.
Reactions from Lawmakers and USPS Employees
News of Trump’s expected move has already sparked reactions from lawmakers, advocacy groups, and postal workers. Democratic leaders, who have previously accused Trump of attempting to undermine the postal service for political gain, have vowed to resist any efforts to politicize the agency. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) have expressed contrasting views on the issue, with Democrats warning of potential voter suppression and Republicans supporting the need for leadership changes.
The American Postal Workers Union (APWU) and the National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) have also voiced concerns, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the USPS’s independence from political interference. Union leaders have pledged to mobilize against any perceived efforts to undermine service delivery or job security.
Historical Precedents and Comparisons
While Trump’s reported plan to reshape the USPS leadership is unprecedented in modern times, past administrations have also sought to influence the agency. President George W. Bush and President Barack Obama both appointed board members who aligned with their policy perspectives, but neither sought to remove an entire board wholesale.
Trump’s move, if executed, would mirror broader efforts to consolidate power within federal agencies. During his first term, he frequently clashed with the Department of Justice, intelligence agencies, and the media, seeking to install loyalists who would execute his vision without resistance. The USPS, as a vital yet often overlooked institution, now appears to be the latest target in this broader strategy.
Possible Outcomes and Future Outlook
The future of the USPS under Trump’s influence remains uncertain. Several scenarios could unfold:
- Legal Challenges and Delays: Any attempt to fire the postal board members could face immediate lawsuits, delaying Trump’s ability to implement changes.
- Congressional Oversight and Intervention: Democratic lawmakers may push for investigations or legislation to protect USPS independence.
- Public Backlash and Protests: Given the widespread reliance on USPS services, public opposition to drastic changes could impact Trump’s ability to execute his plans smoothly.
- Long-Term Policy Shifts: If successful, a Trump-controlled USPS could reshape mail services, voting procedures, and financial operations for years to come.
Conclusion
As Trump reportedly prepares to take control of the USPS by removing the postal board, the implications for mail service, election integrity, and federal governance remain profound. While his supporters view this as an effort to reform a struggling agency, critics warn of political interference that could undermine democracy. The coming months will be critical in determining whether Trump’s plan moves forward and how it will shape the future of the postal service in America.
